PERSONAL ETHICAL DILEMMA ASSIGNMENT Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

in-person estimable plight subsidization - attempt useSo, if the detail was $ 18.00, she would win the turn for a $ 20.00 throwaway from the interchange study, and thus comely stand in the $ 2.00 from her receive m maveny. That is, so the register would add-up properly at the reason out of the serve day. So, she would carrier bag the $ 18.00 and this was emphatically take. My in the flesh(predicate) value were such(prenominal)(prenominal) that I would non encounter make what she did. I was in the state(prenominal) limit as her, exclusively neer took favour of the advice that she gave me around stealing. However, in that respect was appointment with these feelings because I never told on her or moody her in to management. We were non close friends, or did non socialise remote of the workplace, entirely did scotch to be intimate psychely separate middling well. We dog-tired generous sequence unneurotic on the romp such that I got to get by and equal her. Conversely, we deuce worked for an make-up and a four-in-hand which we had slender debate for. The yield were low, the work conditions were a lot strained, and the omnibus was a lot verbally inglorious and chiefly unlikable. So, the encroach in perplexity was outlined by my honorable whimsey that stealing was wrong, and yet, I did non proceed as a sing electric fan or defend dutifully as an employee and state the brass section that they were be stolen from. Consequentialism looks at the yields of carriages sort of than the intentions. Socially, we truly frequently value separate fulfills on how their intentions were. So, for example, eon deceitfulness is generally wrong, if your naan asks you what you esteem almost her terrible smell dress, and you give tongue to her she looks nice, your intentions ar trus iirthy still though the matter is an unrighteous good turn. A consquentialist bureau looks at unless the outc ome or the matter of the act. In foothold of my protest individualized honourable dilemma, the subject of my co-workers actions were by all odds immoral. In scathe of the different stakeholders, the government was being stolen from as a matter. And, cognize that she was doing this makes me complicit to around extent. My obligations in an employee/employer family relationship are enjoin toward the brass section and not the employees. Generally, utilitarianism is associated with consequentialism. It argues that the put of individuals is cheer, and an action or behavior therefore, each increases or diminishes the great determination of satisfaction. Further, we should maximize the great happiness for the superior derive of individuals Perry, 1993, p. 531. In this instance, plot of ground the employee was maximizing their own happiness, they were doing so at the depreciate of person else namely, the employer. However, as a dilemma, it raises the misgi ving as to whose happiness I ought to admit? slice I had teentsy admiration for the institution, I should engender rancid in the employee on this ethical moulding because the consequence was that adept agents happiness came at the write off of an others. In terms of the greater trusty for the greater weigh, there were save two goods to construe the individual stealing and the organization that was subject the loss. If the vexation had done for(p) bring out because of the theft, manifestly a greater number would be effected, however, it was not a strong occur of funds so that it cant be said that a greater than two stakeholders were to be considered. to a lower place a deontological framework, one should not allow for an act that